Public comment: property lines and pushback
At 5:30 p.m. on June 3, 2025, the town’s Ad Hoc Sidewalk Committee opened its latest meeting with a full five-minute allotment for public comment. Paul Crowell Jr.—owner of five-and-three-quarter acres along Meadow Road with 450 feet of frontage—objected to the planned sidewalk that would slice through his family’s land. Citing a 1938 “no-sidewalk” ordinance he hopes still applies, Crowell reminded officials that his Ukrainian-American family has farmed the former Krell parcel since the 1920s.
“School kids aren’t walking here,” he said, suggesting a path on the opposite side of the road would serve evening strollers just as well while sparing his frontage. YouTube video of the exchange is here.
Accessibility plea
Anne Newberry of 23 Hatters Lane countered that the town—not abutters—should foot the bill, arguing that uniformly built walks, similar to Main Street’s, are essential for residents using wheelchairs from New Horizons and Westerly.
Whose liability?
Sarah Willett, 54 Garden Street, raised liability questions: surveyors told her the Garden Street sidewalk sits outside her deeded boundary. If the slab is off-property, who gets sued when someone trips? 😬
Committee business: a policy in pencil
After approving April 29 minutes, members reviewed a draft municipal policy that would codify two unwritten rules of the last 25 years:
- “Substantial direct benefit.” Eligible projects must connect neighborhoods to a public school, trail, or town center.
- Grants first. No grant money, no concrete—unless the Town Council votes to cover the gap.
Members discussed adding “public recreation facilities” (the new splash pad at Tunxis Mead, for example) to the criteria and floated a sliding cost-share, allowing the town to pay up to 75 percent when multiple boxes are ticked. A 75 percent neighborhood petition threshold—mirroring past water-line and speed-bump rules—will remain the bar for resident-initiated walks.
Grading the pavement: A, C, or F
Engineering Director Russ unveiled a blunt A-C-F rating card:
- A – new construction, 5 ft wide, no cracks.
- C – serviceable, narrow or lightly cracked.
- F – heaved, missing, or under 4 ft.
UConn intern Thomas will log addresses by the block, eight to ten hours a week, starting with suspected F segments. Town staff will then price out jackhammers only where the grade flunks.
What’s next
- Inspection blitz: Thomas starts June 10.
- Policy rewrite: Staff will add recreation language and cost-share options.
- Next meeting: July 8, 2025 at 5:30 p.m. (Town Council Chambers).
Sponsor Break ☕️📦
Need a place to stash those political yard signs until the dust settles? Try Farmington Storage—155 Scott Swamp Road, Farmington, CT. Dial 860-777-4001 and ask about the “Meadow Road Detour Special.” Museum-quality air, farmer-quality humor. Your stuff will breathe better than we did during last night’s public comment.
About the Author
Jack Beckett covers government minutiae so you don’t have to. Got a tip, a gripe, or a better coffee roast? Ping him on X.com/WeFarmington or shout across the counter at Einstein Bros. (medium-roast, two sugars, thanks).
Explore more: Editorials | For Sale | Law Enforcement | Historic District | Wetlands | FHS | Zoning | Board of Ed | Jobs
Stay Informed with The Farmington Mercury
Catch every sidewalk skirmish and zoning zinger at wearefarmington.com. Subscribe for free at thefarmingtonmercury.com/subscribe, contact us here, or slide into our DMs on Twi…er, Twix.
About Us • Contact • Privacy • Terms • Media Kit
Creative Commons License
© 2025 The Farmington Mercury / Mercury Local
This article, “Meadow Road, Money, and Metrics: Farmington’s Sidewalk Debate Walks On,” by Jack Beckett is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0.
“Meadow Road, Money, and Metrics: Farmington’s Sidewalk Debate Walks On”
by Jack Beckett, The Farmington Mercury (CC BY-ND 4.0)
