A Bad Film for the Easily Fooled
Dinesh D’Souza’s 2000 Mules is not just a bad film; it’s an insult to anyone with even a shred of intellectual curiosity. The movie’s central claim that anonymous “mules” were stuffing ballot boxes during the 2020 election fell apart when it was scrutinized. But millions of Americans—many of them proud low-information voters—bought into it, not because it made sense, but because it didn’t.
In a Nov. 26 statement, D’Souza admitted, “We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have been correlated with the geolocation data.” Translation: the entire premise of the film was nonsense. If you’re still clinging to 2000 Mules, you might as well believe the moon landing was filmed on a soundstage.
For those masochistic enough to see the fuss, here’s the IMDB page for 2000 Mules. Spoiler alert: it’s a case study in constructing a conspiracy for people who think typing “research” into Facebook makes them experts.
Why Do People Fall for This Stuff?
The answer: low-information voters. These people don’t engage with political news beyond what their Facebook feed or favorite YouTube personality feeds them.
Take Monica Shepherd’s account from The New Yorker. In her small Georgia town, voters get their “facts” from memes, televangelists, and friends who “don’t trust Google.” One neighbor confidently cited a meme claiming Chili’s was closing all its restaurants. When Shepherd debunked it using multiple sources, the response was, “And you believe Google?”
This mentality is a gift to propagandists like D’Souza. Low-information voters are often more interested in feeling “right” than being informed. As Yale professor Joshua Kalla notes, they may care deeply about specific issues like taxes or abortion but show little interest in broader political realities. And when someone like D’Souza spoon-feeds them a story that reinforces their biases, they eat it up without a second thought.
The Echo Chamber of Ignorance
The real power of 2000 Mules wasn’t in its “evidence” (which didn’t exist) but in its ability to spread like wildfire among the misinformed. Low-information voters don’t trust mainstream media, but they’ll believe a YouTube video with ominous music and shaky graphics. They dismiss fact-checking as part of a vast conspiracy while sharing memes that “feel” true.
Consider the Facebook commenter who told Shepherd, “Whole lot of stuff be labeled not true on Facebook, almost like Facebook has its own agenda.” This dismissal of facts is the hallmark of low-information voters, who—according to Yale Law professor David Schleicher—lack incentives to seek out reliable information. As he puts it, “Their incentive to know specifics about politics is extremely weak.”
D’Souza didn’t need to make a good film; he just needed to make a film that confirmed his audience’s preconceived notions. The result? A conspiracy-laden mess that people like Shepherd’s neighbor still cite as “proof” the 2020 election was stolen.
From Memes to “Movements”
One of the scariest aspects of 2000 Mules is how it transformed low-information voters into conspiracy evangelists. Armed with the film’s pseudoscientific nonsense, these voters became foot soldiers in the battle against reality. They patrolled drop boxes with guns, burned ballots in Oregon, and cited the film as justification for restrictive voting laws.
When confronted with evidence debunking the film, many doubled down. “I trust what I see,” said one man in Shepherd’s Facebook thread. But what did he “see”? Carefully edited footage designed to stoke outrage and fear.
Even after the film was pulled by co-producer Salem Media Group, D’Souza continued to insist the “underlying premise” was valid. This isn’t just intellectual dishonesty; it’s outright manipulation of a demographic already primed to believe the worst.
The Problem With Both Parties
Let’s be clear: low-information voters aren’t exclusive to one political side. While 2000 Mules was a right-wing fever dream, the underlying issue—people who refuse to engage critically with information—is bipartisan.
If you’re a voter, your job isn’t just to show up at the polls. It’s to read, think, and challenge your own assumptions. Stop relying on memes. Stop trusting random YouTubers. And for the love of democracy, stop letting your uncle’s Facebook posts dictate your worldview.
As political scientist Richard Fording points out, “Low-information voters are less likely to fact-check claims and more likely to trust people they respect.” This means it’s up to all of us—regardless of party affiliation—to break out of echo chambers and engage with the world beyond our bubbles.
Thanks to Our Sponsor!
A big thank-you to Farmington Storage for supporting thoughtful journalism. Whether you need a place to stash antiques or a hideaway for your copy of 2000 Mules, they’ve got you covered. Visit them at 155 Scott Swamp Road or call 860.777.4001 today.
A Final Word from Jack Beckett
I’m Jack Beckett, your caffeine-fueled champion of critical thinking. Let The Farmington Mercury help you cut through the noise. Whether you’re looking for in-depth election coverage or thought-provoking editorials, we’re here for you.
Want to share a hot take or debunk a meme? Message us on X—or Twix, as we like to call it. And remember: if you’re not reading, questioning, and engaging, you’re part of the problem.
—Jack “Pouring the Truth, One Espresso Shot at a Time” Beckett
Because ignorance is the real conspiracy.
